Legal Aid Announces Issuance of $13.1 Million as Part of Class Action Settlement to Over 30,000 New Yorkers Whose Public Assistance Was Wrongly Terminated or Reduced by City

The Legal Aid Society announces the distribution of $13.1 million pursuant to a class action settlement to over 30,000 New Yorkers who received public assistance in New York City and whose benefits were wrongfully reduced or stopped by the City between July 8, 2007 and December 22, 2015, due to alleged violations of employment requirements. These punitive sanctions were imposed without adequate notice to members of the plaintiff class of their ability to avoid the sanction by showing that there was good cause for the violation or that the violation was not willful.

The settlement is pursuant to Smith, et. al. v. Proud, et. al., which was originally filed in April 2010 and was brought by Legal Aid and Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP against the New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance and the New York City Human Resources Administration (HRA). Plaintiffs argued that two types of notices required to be sent to plaintiffs during the sanction process violated the New York Social Services Law and the due process rights of the plaintiff class. In November 2018, plaintiffs and defendants reached an agreement that includes substantial monetary and procedural relief to members of the plaintiff class.

“Legal Aid represented scores of clients who could have avoided sanctions had they been adequately informed that their inability to comply with employment requirements would be excused if, for example, they were ill, they could not obtain child care, they had a meeting at their child’s school or for any number of other legitimate reasons. This settlement provides compensation for the neediest of these clients,” said Les Helfman, one of the attorneys for the class.


During the period targeted by the lawsuit, tens of thousands of individuals received notices from the Human Resources Administration (HRA) stating that their subsistence level cash assistance and/or food benefits were being terminated or reduced to due to an alleged failure to comply with the agency’s requirements that recipients seek and maintain employment. The duration of one of these punitive sanctions could have been as long as six months.

In Smith, et. al. v. Proud, et. al., plaintiffs’ lawyers challenged the adequacy of the Conciliation Notice and Notice of Decision (also known as Notice of Intent) required to be issued prior to the imposition of employment-related sanctions in New York City and negotiated a settlement that included both monetary and procedural relief for the plaintiff class. First, the settlement requires the payment of a one-time benefit to eligible class members who are currently in receipt of public assistance. The settlement also requires defendants to review their records every three months for a period of two years and issue one-time payments to class members who were not in receipt of public assistance at the time of a prior payment, but who are at the time of the review. In order to be eligible to receive a payment under the settlement, a class member must have an open Cash Assistance case and must have been sanctioned between July 8, 2007 and December 22, 2015. The settlement also requires the City and State to delete the alleged sanctions from the case records for all plaintiff class members during the same time period.

On June 1st, one-time payments totaling $13.1 million were issued to the EBT cards of over 30,000 eligible class members in New York City and sanctions were deleted from their case records.

LA Times: Desperate to ease homelessness, California officials look to New York ‘right to shelter’ policy

By Benjamin Oreskes
July 21, 2019

Much about California’s homelessness crisis has confounded state and local officials. But what to do about the tens of thousands of people living outdoors has perhaps done so more than anything else.

North Jersey: Bergen County Jail air conditioning repaired after outage, protesters gather despite heat

By Monsy Alvarado
July 20, 2019

Nearly two dozen protesters gathered Saturday outside the Bergen County Jail in Hackensack, demanding that air conditioners that had been malfunctioning for weeks be fixed and warned that the weekend's scorching temperatures create dangerous conditions for inmates.

Pix 11: Bergen County Jail air conditioning working after Friday night breakdowns: officials

By Mark Sundstrom
July 20, 2019

While advocacy groups demanded answers Saturday amid reports of broken air conditioning at New Jersey’s Bergen County Jail, the county sheriff said Saturday that air conditioning had been restored after units malfunctioned Friday night.

The Real Deal: Widespread confusion over preferential rents opens the door for rent hikes

By Georgia Kromrei
July 19, 2019

Conflicting interpretations of a few lines of the new rent law is leading to widespread panic, with some landlords rushing to re-issue leases and others throwing caution to the wind and risking potential overcharge proceedings.